Wednesday, 15 March 2017

Demand response could limit the need for new power plants in Michigan, studies say




As Michigan utilities and policymakers grapple with how to replace lost generation from retired power plants, a pair of recent studies suggest better management of demand can be a major part of the solution – saving ratepayers money in the process.
The reports suggest that demand response efforts — or incentives meant to decrease energy demand during peak periods — can effectively limit the need for new natural gas plants in particular, which are the favored option for utilities moving forward as a relatively cheap, baseload source of energy.
Advanced Energy Economy Institute released a report Friday showing that Michigan could offset a projected 2,000 MW summer demand increase in the Lower Peninsula through 2026 just through demand response programs. In addition to avoiding or limiting the need for new power plants, it would also save ratepayers up to $1.2 billion, the report added.
Meanwhile, the Michigan Agency for Energy and the Michigan Public Service Commission released a report in late January with similar conclusions. The report was the result of an inquiry to the Midcontinent Independent System Operator about capacity constraints in the Lower Peninsula under certain circumstances, including nuclear plant closures.
“It seems that it will be necessary for Michigan (load serving entities) to follow through with their current plans for demand response development,” the MPSC report notes. “The demand response programs become increasingly important when the system is stressed due to high demand and/or unexpected plant outages.”

The MPSC report added that demand response programs would be the “most cost-effective way” to “provide significant contributions toward meeting near-term capacity requirements” and delay the need for additional peaking capacity.


http://midwestenergynews.com/2017/02/22/demand-response-could-limit-the-need-for-new-power-plants-in-michigan-studies-say/

How New York City Gets Its Electricity

When you turn on a light or charge your phone, the electricity coming from the outlet may well have traveled hundreds of miles across the power grid that blankets most of North America — the world’s largest machine, and one of its most eccentric.
Your household power may have been generated by Niagara Falls, or by a natural-gas-fired plant on a barge floating off the Brooklyn shore. But the kilowatt-hour produced down the block probably costs more than the one produced at the Canadian border.

Moreover, a surprising portion of the system is idle except for the hottest days of the year, when already bottlenecked transmission lines into the New York City area reach their physical limit.

A Step-by-Step Plan for Grid Modernization in a Distributed Energy World


The last big burst in U.S. smart grid investment was federally funded, via the Obama administration’s stimulus plan. The next big burst may soon be coming. Both the Trump administration and Senate Democrats have proposed competing infrastructure investment plans measuring from $500 billion to $1 trillion, and a leaked list of 50 proposed projects worth $137 billion included a few energy projects in the mix.
America’s Power Plan wants the proper cost and value of distributed energy to be incorporated into whatever billion-dollar grid plans may come of this infrastructure push, and it has a plan to do it.
In a new paper, the nonprofit research group laid out a four-step process for utilities and regulators to choose their goals (clean energy and carbon reduction, fair and low prices for all, and utility-specific grid values) and then compare the cost of making smart grid upgrades versus not making them in order to achieve those goals.

https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/a-step-by-step-plan-for-grid-modernization-in-a-distributed-energy-world